Celine Naef vs Weronika Ewald Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Naef vs W. Ewald

Celine Naef
SUI
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
19
-
Height
-
268
C. Rank
458
121
Best Rank
455
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$220.5K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Weronika Ewald
POL
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
19
-
Height
-
268
C. Rank
458
121
Best Rank
455
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$220.5K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Naef 1 - 0 Ewald
They have played 2 sets in total, with Celine Naef winning 2 and Weronika Ewald winning 0. The last match between Celine Naef and Weronika Ewald was at the W75 Leszno, 06-02-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naef | 1 |
| Ewald | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W75 Leszno(02-06-25)
Celine Naef
6
6
Weronika Ewald
3
2
C. Naef vs W. Ewald H2H Profile
C. Naef vs W. Ewald Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Celine Naef has won 42.04% of points on their second serve, while Weronika Ewald has won 36.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Celine Naef, in recent form, has won 47.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Weronika Ewald has won 51.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.73% and 34.80% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Celine Naef has saved 54.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Weronika Ewald has saved 50.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Celine Naef has won 50.00% of matches played (W/L 21/21), with Weronika Ewald winning 62.50% (W/L 35/21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Celine Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 70/27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 26/25). Weronika Ewald has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 26/16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Celine Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 18/16), where as Weronika Ewald has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.45% of matches (W/L 27/20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Celine Naef winning 1 times and Weronika Ewald being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Celine Naef winning 2 and Weronika Ewald winning 0.
- The last match between Celine Naef and Weronika Ewald was at the W75 Leszno, 06-02-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:26.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Celine Naef has played against opponents with an average rank of 228.69 while Weronika Ewald has played against players with an average rank of 387.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Celine Naef has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Weronika Ewald has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Celine Naef has converted 41.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Weronika Ewald has converted 41.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Celine Naef vs Weronika Ewald Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Naef vs W. Ewald H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:10:26 | Average Match Time | 1:10:26 |
| 59% (37/63) | 1st Serve % | 53% (24/45) |
| 68% (25/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (12/24) |
| 58% (15/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (11/21) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 49% (22/45) | Return Points Win % | 37% (23/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Naef 47%, Ewald 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Naef 52%, Ewald 61%.
Break Points Saved %: Naef 58%, Ewald 55%.
C. Naef Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
W. Ewald Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||

C. Naef vs W. Ewald Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.38% (126/76) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.32% (76/50) |
| 59.49% (282/192) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.45% (166/118) |
| 54.30% (2363/1989) | Games Win/Loss | 54.21% (1405/1187) |
| 53.33% (16/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.11% (44/28) |
| 50.98% (26/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.90% (26/16) |
| 71.72% (71/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 59.09% (13/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 598 | Aces Total | 213 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.52 |
| 475 | Total Double Faults | 655 |
| 1:36:45 | Average Match Time | 1:37:8 |
| 322.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.4 |
| 60% (8306/13952) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4743/7896) |
| 64% (5336/8306) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2946/4743) |
| 49% (2740/5646) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1391/3153) |
| 50% (864/1737) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (560/1119) |
| 46% (6360/13911) | Return Points Win % | 48% (3875/8018) |
| 42.11% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 65.58% (101/53) | Challenger W/L | 52.86% (37/33) |
| 86.67% (13/2) | Futures W/L | 72.22% (39/15) |
| 63% (126/201) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (75/125) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (21/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (8/19) |
| 58% (40/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 86% (118/102) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (72/66) |
| 14% (118/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (72/6) |
| 29% (84/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (54/10) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction03:50 AM 18/11/25
Prediction03:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction06:30 AM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
03:30
H2H 0-0
03:50
H2H 0-0
04:05
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal